Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The application, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the satisfaction…
Judgment
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER Date : 16/07/2026 ORAL ORDER
#1. Present application has been filed by the applicant seeking temporary bail on the ground of self treatment as well as final rites of mother-in-law.
#2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State.
#3. Having heard and considering the averments made in the application, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein, as well as considering the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the present applicant. R/CR.MA/16136/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026
#4. The application, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the applicant shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of the temporary bail period forthwith. The notification issued by the State under Section 268 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in case of the applicant, shall remain in abeyance, during the aforesaid period of temporary bail.
4.1 Rule is made absolute accordingly. Direct service is permitted. URIL RANA (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 268.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 16 Jul 2026. The bench was SANJEEV.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.