Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a R/SCR.A/9685/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026 period of three days from the date of his actual release on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten…
Judgment
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER Date : 09/07/2026 ORAL ORDER
#1. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole leave on the ground stated in the application.
#2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of the respondent – State.
#3. Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.
#4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the present petitioner.
#5. The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a R/SCR.A/9685/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026 period of three days from the date of his actual release on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of the parole leave period forthwith. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
5.1 Direct service is permitted.
5.2 The applicant shall mark presence before the nearest police station on 3rd and 5th day of his parole leave period.
#6. The notification issued by the State under Section 268 of the Cr.P.C. in the case of the petitioner shall remain in abeyance during the said period of parole leave. PD (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 268.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 09 Jul 2026. The bench was SANJEEV.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.