✦ Gujarat High Court · 16 Jul 2026

NIDHIBEN v. RAMESHBHAI NANJIBHAI PRAJAPTI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. After arguing for some time, under the instruction of his client, Mr. Patel, learned advocate, does not invite reasons in this application and accordingly, he does not press this application. Nonetheless, Mr.Patel, learned advocate, would request this Court that since the applicant has permanently…
  • Para 66. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of, as not pressed. GAURAV J THAKER (MAULIK J. SHELAT, J)

Judgment

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT Date : 16/07/2026 ORAL ORDER

#1. Heard Mr.Maharshi H. Patel, learned advocate for the applicant.

#2. After arguing for some time, under the instruction of his client, Mr. Patel, learned advocate, does not invite reasons in this application and accordingly, he does not press this application. Nonetheless, Mr.Patel, learned advocate, would request this Court that since the applicant has permanently shifted to Vadodara and she is a working woman, she may be allowed to appear in the family suit instituted by the applicant before the Family Court at Surendranagar by video conferencing.

#3. The permission as sought for is granted.

#4. It is open for the applicant to request the Family Court at Surendranagar to allow her to appear in Family Suit No.33 of 2025 instituted by herself by way of video conferencing. As C/MCA/1731/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026 and when such request will be made by the applicant, the Family Court, Surendranagar concerned is requested to accept such request and thereby allow the applicant to appear through video conference except when her presence is required for her cross-examination or otherwise.

#5. It is made clear that this Court has neither gone into nor examined the merits of the matter except what has been observed and directed above.

#6. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of, as not pressed. GAURAV J THAKER (MAULIK J. SHELAT, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Mca No. 1731 of 2026). ← Search more judgments