✦ Gujarat High Court · 16 Jul 2026

JANUBEN WD/O SAVDASBHAI & Ors. v. NAGARPALIKA MANGROL & Anr.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, the present appeal stands dismissed for non-

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 16 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2016 In R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 16 of 2016 ============================================= JANUBEN WD/O SAVDASBHAI & ORS. Versus NAGARPALIKA MANGROL & ANR. ============================================= Appearance: ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 6,9 ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,4,5,7,8 UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Appellant(s) No. 3 MR MURALI N DEVNANI(1863) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ============================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT Date : 16/07/2026 ORAL ORDER Since the advocate notice is served upon appellant Nos.6 & 9 and unserved qua appellant Nos.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 & 8 as also appellant No.3 expired, no steps have been taken as also none appears. Hence, the present appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Connected CA is also disposed of. R & P, if any received, be sent back to the concerned Trial Court. Lalji Desai (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the present appeal stands dismissed for non-

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 16 Jul 2026. The bench was MAULIK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Sa No. 16 of 2016). ← Search more judgments