INSURANCE CO v. RANSINH NAGSINH RAJPUT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
this appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 s. 21(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission as prayed for is granted. In view of the pursis submitted by learned advocate for the appellant, this appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Connected civil application, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Judgment
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1959 of 2017 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2017 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1959 of 2017 1 NEW UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. PLOT NO.13, SECTOR NO.9NEAR DENA BANK, GANDHIDHAM-KACHCHH VERSUS Appellant(s) 1 3 RANSINH NAGSINH RAJPUT KHARIYA -GOGALIYATA. RAMSURDISTRICT - BADMER RAJASTHAN SAMBHKAUR RANSINH RAJPUT KHARIYA -GOGALIYATA. RAMSURDISTRICT - BADMER RAJASTHAN 2 4 PARPUKUMVARBAA KANSINH RAJPUT KHARIYA -GOGALIYATA. RAMSURDISTRICT - BADMER RAJASTHAN SURAJKAUR RANSINH RAJPUT BEING MINOR THROUGH THE NATURAL GUARDIAN RANSINH NAGSINH RAJPUTAT KHARIYA- GOGALIYA, TALUKA RAMSUR, DISTRICT BADMER, RAJASTHAN 5 SAYARKAUR RANSINH 6 MADANSINH RANSINH C/FA/1959/2017 CONCILIATION ORDER DATED: 12/07/2025 RAJPUT BEING MINOR THROUGH THE NATURAL GUARDIAN RANSINH NAGSINH RAJPUTAT KHARIYA- GOGALIYA, TALUKA RAMSUR, DISTRICT BADMER, RAJASTHAN BHUPENDRABHAI L SOLANKI AT RAVAPAR, TALUKA MORBI, DISTRICT RAJKOT 8 RAJPUT BEING MINOR THROUGH THE NATURAL GUARDIAN RANSINH NAGSINH RAJPUTAT KHARIYA- GOGALIYA, TALUKA RAMSUR, DISTRICT BADMER, RAJASTHAN P R AGRAWAL AT M R SHAH CHAMBER, BEHIND B M PETROL PUMP, GANDHIDHAM-KACHCHH 7 9 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. BELOW DOSHI TOWER, SECOND FLOOR, NR OLD BUS STATION, MORBI, DISTRICT RAJKOT Defendant(s) ========================================================== Appearance: MRS VASAVDATTA BHATT(193) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 8 MR NL RAMNANI(2400) for the Defendant(s) No. 7 MR SUNIL B PARIKH(582) for the Defendant(s) No. 9 ========================================================== CONCILIATION ORDER
With the consent of the parties, this matter was taken up for hearing in the Lok Adalat.
Learned advocate for the appellant has tendered withdrawal pursis dated 12.07.2025 which is taken on record. She seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as C/FA/1959/2017 CONCILIATION ORDER DATED: 12/07/2025 per the pursis.
Operative part
Permission as prayed for is granted. In view of the pursis submitted by learned advocate for the appellant, this appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. Connected civil application, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Since the appeal is withdrawn, the award amount lying with the bank in the form of FDs/ lying either with the Tribunal or with the Nazir Branch of the Tribunal may be disbursed in favour of the claimant/s after due verification by way of RTGS.
Necessary Court fees, if any, be refunded to the appellant, as per the provisions of Section 21(1) of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987.
The order passed in this appeal shall not be treated as precedent in any other matter including any case arising out of the same incident. C/FA/1959/2017 CONCILIATION ORDER DATED: 12/07/2025
The Registry is directed to transmit the record and proceedings to the Tribunal forthwith, if any. (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) CONCILIATOR (SATYAJEET A. DESAI, LD. DESIGNATED SENIOR ADVOCATE) CONCILIATOR DIVYA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 — s. 21(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.