SURESHCHANDRA SHANTILAL SHAH v. STATE OF GUJARAT & 2
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
application is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission is accordingly granted. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith. [M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 5457 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ====================================== SURESHCHANDRA SHANTILAL SHAH - Applicant Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondents ====================================== Appearance : MR VIJAY PATEL, LD. ADVOCATE FOR HL PATEL ADVOCATES for the Applicant. MR KL PANDYA, APP for the Respondents. ====================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 28/02/2012 ORAL JUDGMENT
#1. The present application u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant herein – original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being C.R.No.I-23 of 2008 registered with Navapura Police Station, Vadodara. CR.MA/5457/2008 JUDGMENT
#2. Mr.Vijay Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
#3. Permission is accordingly granted. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated forthwith. [M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 28 Feb 2012. The bench was M R SHAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.