Judgment · High Court · 1997
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
observations, the petition is hereby dismissed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 354, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1384 of 1997 CORAM: H. R. SHELAT, J. Date: 15.10.1997 (cid:9)The petitioner hereinabove prays for anticipatory bail because the complaint for the offence under section 354, 506 and 504 of IPC and under section 3 (10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act (hereinafter referred as "Atrocities Act" for short ) is filed against him and he is apprehending the arrest by the Investigating Officer. In view of section 18 of the Atrocities Act, anticipatory bail cannot be granted because sec. 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure is not made applicable to such cases. Consequently, the court is not vested with the power to release the accused on anticipatory bail in such cases and, therefore, the application on that count is required to be dismissed at this stage, and therefore, Mr Pandya learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner present in the court, surrenders to the judicial custody. He may be taken in judicial custody and necessary directions for approaching the Special Court for bail in usual course may be given. (cid:9)The petitioner is present in the court and is formerly taken in judicial custody. He shall apper before the Special Court at Baroda on 20.10.1997 and if he so chooses may file an application for being released on bail. The Special Court at Baroda will than dispose of the application in accordance with law without being influenced by the present order. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested. If the petitioner fails to obtain bail, it would be open to the INvestigating Officer to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. For the aforesaid resons and observations, the petition is hereby dismissed. DS Permitted. Copy of this order be sent to the Sessions Judge, at Baroda. (cid:9) (cid:9)(H. R. SHELAT, J.) (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: observations, the petition is hereby dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 354, 504, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 15 Oct 1997. The bench was H R SHELAT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.