KISHANBHAI NANDUBHAI RAVAL v. STATE OF GUJ

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 447 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================

#1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

#2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

#3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

#4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

#5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KISHANBHAI NANDUBHAI RAVAL Versus STATE OF GUJ -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KR RAVAL for Petitioner MR ST MEHTA APP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 19/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)This Revision under section 397 read with section 401 CRPC has been preferred by the accused in Sessions Case No. 76/93. (cid:9)In Sessions Case No. 76/93, the accused was convicted of the offence punishable under section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The accused was sentenced with RI for five years and a fine of Rs.50,000/-, in default of payment of fine, SI for one year was imposed by the learned Assistant Judge, Mehsana. Feeling aggrieved, the accused had preferred Criminal Appeal No. 32/93. The said Appeal was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mehsana, by judgment and order dated 13th September, 1993. Feeling aggrieved, the accused has preferred the present Revision. (cid:9)Both the courts below have held the accused guilty of possessing 'GANJA' to the extent of 3 Kgs. In view of the possession of 'GANJA' having been proved against the accused, neither the order of conviction, nor the order of sentence calls for interference. (cid:9)Revision Application is dismissed. Rule is discharged. (cid:9) (cid:9)( MS R.M.DOSHIT J ) JOSHI (cid:9) (cid:9)