AADEARSH IPCL KARMACHARI UNION v. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LTD
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. S.N. Shelat for MR DEVANG NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 06/03/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)Heard learned advocate Mr.Raval for M/s. Anand Advocates for the petitioner and learned A.G. Mr. S.N.Shelat for Mr. Devang Nanavaty for the respondents. (cid:9)The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that the union approached the conciliation officer for absorption of contract labour. IPCL has agreed to absorb 1604 workers leaving aside just legal claim of the members of the petitioner who are senior waiting for their absorption. (cid:9)From the petition itself, it is undisputed that the petitioners are the employees or the workers of the labour contractors. In view of the grievance raised by the petitioner union, it is open for the petitioners to approach the conciliation officer and then appropriate authority for appropriate relief under the provisions of the Contract Labour Regulation (Abolition) Act, 1970 as well as under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. If the petitioners will approach the conciliation officer within ten days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, then, the concerned officer will conclude the conciliation proceedings in accordance with law within six weeks thereafter and thereafter, if the failure report is submitted, the appropriate authority will take appropriate decision in accordance with law on such failure report as to whether reference is required to be made or not within four weeks thereafter. With these observations and directions, this petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. Ad.interim relief, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
6.3.2002.(cid:9) (cid:9)(H.K. Rathod,J.) Vyas (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Abolition Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 06 Mar 2002. The bench was H K RATHOD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.