✦ Gujarat High Court · 21 May 1996

CHMPAKBHAI K KAHAR v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Civil Application No. 5564 of 1996N N MATHUR

Case at a glance

Judgment

Shri Kamal Mehta, AGP for the respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR Date of decision: 06/11/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order dated 21st May 1996, Kamleshbai Thakorebhai Kahar, son-in-law of the petitioner herein has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the PASA Act"). It is contended that simply because the aforesaid detenu is alleged to be a bootlegger, he cannot be detained under PASA Act, unless there is any material to show that his activities are likely to adversely affect the maintenance of public order. Learned counsel placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Piyush Kantilal Mehta v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad City and another, A.I.R. 1989 SC 491.

2.(cid:9)I have perused the material on record with the assistance of the learned counsel. There is no material on the record to show that the activities of the said detenu, as a bootlegger, had adversely affected or likely to affect adversely the maintenance of public order. Thus, the order of detention cannot be upheld. In the result the Special Civil Application is allowed. The order of detention dated 21st May 1996 is quashed and set aside. It is directed that the detenu - Kamleshbhai Thakorbhai Kahar, the son in law of the petitioner herein shall be released forthwith, if he is not required in any other case. Rule is made absolute. -oOo- karim*

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 21 May 1996. The bench was N N MATHUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 5564 of 1996). ← Search more judgments