SHINGAR LIMITED v. EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 27 Feb 2026
- Bench
- HEMANT M
Outcome
Disposed of
is allowed with following directions: (a) The petition is disposed of in
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. On the other hand, this petition is opposed by learned advocate Mr. A.V. Nair, who appeared on advance copy being served, on behalf of the respondent. Learned advocate Mr. Nair submits that as per his instructions the presiding o!cer of Jaipur Branch has been…
- Para 44. Considering the submission made by learned advocate Mr.Dave and the decision in SCA No.6511 of 2022, relied by the learned advocate for the petitioner wherein, in the similar situation this Court has disposed of the matter by protecting the petitioner from coercive steps till…
Judgment
The present petition is (cid:14)led under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner praying to declare the action of the respondent in initiating recovery proceedings against the petitioner in pursuance to section 7A order dated 16.01.2026 though appeal against said orders are pending before the learned C.G.I.T and presiding o!cer of learned C.G.I.T is not available at present and in absence of presiding o!cer of learned C.G.I.T, the application which is preferred under section 7(o) for waiving the pre-deposit would remain undecided.
Learned advocate Mr.H.R.Dave submits that if this order is not stayed then on completion of 15 days from the date of issuance of the order, recovery proceedings would be initiated and coercive steps against the present petitioner would likely to be taken. Learned advocate Mr.Dave submits that it may cause hardship to the present petitioner. C/SCA/2719/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/02/2026
On the other hand, this petition is opposed by learned advocate Mr. A.V. Nair, who appeared on advance copy being served, on behalf of the respondent. Learned advocate Mr. Nair submits that as per his instructions the presiding o!cer of Jaipur Branch has been given the charge and he is visiting twice in a month and the next proposed date of visit of presiding o!cer is between 9 – 12 March, 2026. Learned advocate Mr. Nair submits that he is required to show some bona(cid:14)de by depositing the amount which is required for (cid:14)ling the appeal before the learned tribunal. Learned advocate Mr. Nair submits that in absence of any deposit no relief can be granted to the present petitioner as learned tribunal would also be not in possession in absence of deposits except coming to the conclusion that application under section 7(o) is required to be granted. In view of the above, learned advocate prays to dismiss this petition.
Operative part
Considering the submission made by learned advocate Mr.Dave and the decision in SCA No.6511 of 2022, relied by the learned advocate for the petitioner wherein, in the similar situation this Court has disposed of the matter by protecting the petitioner from coercive steps till the decision of the appeal. In view of the above, this petition is allowed with following directions:
(a) The petition is disposed of in view of non availability of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, wherein the appeal is (cid:14)led by the petitioner.
(b) It is clari(cid:14)ed that till the application under section 7(o) of the petitioner is heard on merits, the respondents are directed not to take coercive steps against the petitioner. It is further clari(cid:14)ed that this court has not examined the matter on merits and since the Appellate Tribunal is not available on regular basis, the matter is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(c) It is clari(cid:14)ed that the interim relief restraining the C/SCA/2719/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/02/2026 respondents from taking coercive steps will operate till the Tribunal hears the application under section 7(o). The petition is disposed of, accordingly.
Direct service is permitted. Dolly (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: is allowed with following directions: (a) The petition is disposed of in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 27 Feb 2026. The bench was HEMANT M.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.