Income Tax Reference No. 82 of 1989 · Gujarat High Court · 2002
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Jul 2002
- Bench
- M S SHAH
Provisions considered
Judgment
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus C.M.C. [INDIA] PVT.LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 82 of 1989 MRS MAUNA BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 03/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) (cid:9)In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of assessment year 1982-83 :- "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that cash compensatory support received from the Government is a capital receipt and as such not exigible to tax ?"
2.(cid:9)Heard Mrs Mauna Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the applicant-revenue. Though served, none appears for the respondent-assessee.
3.(cid:9)The learned counsel for the revenue has invited out attention to the provisions of Section 28(iiib) of the Income-tax Act,1961 and submitted that in view of the aforesaid clause inserted by the Finance Act, 1990 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1967, the amount of Cash Compensatory Support received by the assessee was a revenue receipt and, therefore, liable to be taxed.
4.(cid:9)Clause (iiib) of Section 28 inserted with retrospective effect from 1.4.1967 reads as under :- "28.(cid:9)The following income shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" - (cid:9)(iiib) cash assistance (by whatever name called) received or receivable by any person against exports under any scheme of the Government of India. " (cid:9)In view of the aforesaid legislative amendment with retrospective effect, there can be no scope for any controversy and it has to be held that the Cash Compensatory Support received by the assessee was a revenue receipt.
5.(cid:9)In view of the above discussion, our answer to the question is in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
6.(cid:9)The reference accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(M.S. Shah, J.) (K.A. Puj, J.) sundar/- (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Income Tax Act, 1961; Finance Act, 1990.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 03 Jul 2002. The bench was M S SHAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.