✦ Gujarat High Court · 21 Nov 2000

Income Tax Reference No. 233 of 1985 · Gujarat High Court · 2000

Income Tax Reference No. 233 of 1985DHARMADHIKARI, M S SHAH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SARASPUR MILLS LIMITED -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR B B Naik with Mr RP BHATT for Petitioner MR M J SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF…

Judgment

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SARASPUR MILLS LIMITED -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR B B Naik with Mr RP BHATT for Petitioner MR M J SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 21/11/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) In this Reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred to us for our opinion in respect of assessment year 1974-75 : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled in law to interest u/s 214 of the Income tax Act, 1961 on the refund granted to it on the excess of advance tax paid upto the date of the CIT (A) as claimed ?" In this regard, Mr. Naik for the revenue and Mr. Shah for the assessee stated that the question is concluded against the assessee by the Apex Court in Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT , 216 ITR 759. In view of the above decision, we answer the question in the negative, i.e. in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(D.M.Dharmadhikari, C.J.) (cid:9) (cid:9)(M. S. Shah, J.) parekh (cid:9) (cid:9)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. 214.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 21 Nov 2000. The bench was DHARMADHIKARI, M S SHAH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Income Tax Reference No. 233 of 1985). ← Search more judgments