Whether this case involves a substantial question v. STATE OF GUJARAT & 2
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 22 Mar 2006
- Bench
- B SHETHNA, M C PATEL
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4471 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 4 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== MANIBEN DAHYABHAI & 2 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : NOTICE UNSERVED for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 3. MR SP HASURKAR, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. MR SN SHELAT for Respondent(s) : 3, MR DEVANG NANAVATI for Respondent(s) : 3, ===================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date : 22/03/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) This petition was ordered to be heard with Special Civil Applications No.4464 to 4467 of 1993. Special Civil Applications No.4464 to 4467 of 1993 SCA/4471/1993 JUDGMENT were disposed of by this court on 31st January, 2006. For the reasons recorded in it, this petition is also disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. ( B.J. Shethna, J. ) ( M.C. Patel, J. )
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 22 Mar 2006. The bench was B SHETHNA, M C PATEL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.