Whether this case involves a substantial question v. URBAN LAND TRIBUNAL AND EX- OFFICO SECRETARY & 1
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 28 Jul 2005
- Bench
- AKIL KURESHI
Provisions considered
Judgment
the High Court. This ex-parte order was confirmed by the High Court by an order dated 28/6/1991 to continue till final disposal of the petition. It is further stated that on the date of coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 on 30th March, 1999, the possession of surplus vacant land had not been taken by the Government. In view of this clear statement on affidavit on behalf of respondents by virtue of the application of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 proceedings with respect to the above mentioned land have abated. Petition disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. smita/ (Akil Kureshi, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Repeal Act, 1999.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 28 Jul 2005. The bench was AKIL KURESHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.