GOVERDHAN CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED) v. COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ULC)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
present petition is disposed off accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 04/08/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT
1.(cid:9)This petition arises from orders passed under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act,
2.(cid:9)It is common ground on both sides that the State of Gujarat adopted the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 on 30th March, 1999.
3.(cid:9)It is also common ground on both sides that by virtue of section 4 of the Repeal Act, all proceedings pending on the said date shall abate.
Operative part
4.(cid:9)It is so found and accordingly held, and the present petition is disposed off accordingly.
5.(cid:9)Learned AGP states on instructions that the State of Gujarat will abide by the Circular issued by the State Government in the Revenue Department No. ULC/1099-602/V1 dated 15th April, 1999.
6.(cid:9)Rule is accordingly discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
7.(cid:9)It merely requires to be noted on the basis of the record of the present petition, that the petitioner-Society appears to be in possession of the land in question in view of the specific averments made in the petition and not controverted by any affidavit-in-reply by the respondents. This position is also reflected in the order passed by this Court in C.A. 9260/97 dated 17th June, 1998. It is also to be noted that these are mere observations on the basis of the record of the present petition and are not to be regarded as findings of fact on any factual controversy between the parties. (cid:9) (cid:9)(Y.B. BHATT, J.) ***** pirzada/- (cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: present petition is disposed off accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Repeal Act, 1999.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 04 Aug 1999. The bench was Y B BHATT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.