✦ Gujarat High Court · 30 Jan 1996

Judgment · High Court · 1996

N N MATHUR4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Applications are disposed of

Judgment

Operative part

Applications are disposed of.

2.(cid:9)By way of petition, the petitioners in Special Civil Application No.4682/90 seek direction to respondent No.1 to make payment as per the directions issued by respondent No.2-District Panchayat as per Annexure 'A'. The say of the petitioners is that in the year 1986-87 and 1987-88, there was drought in Saurashtra area including District Junagadh and as such the petitioner started cattle camps as per the Government scheme and subsidies were being paid to the organizers of the cattle camps. Petitioner No.1 was the sarpanch of the respondent No.1-Gram Panchayat. The Gram Panchayat had adopted a Resolution to arrange cattle camps in order to help the drought affected people in the area. The decision was taken by the Gram Panchayat to collect ad-hoc funds for organising cattle camps by taking amount of loan without interest from certain persons. Accordingly petitioners No.1,2 and 3 paid Rs.10,000/-, 54,000/- and 35,000/- respectively.

It is further stated that petitioner No.1 subsequently paid Rs.30,000/- and 22,000/- respectively. On 6th November, 1988, one Nanajibhai Narsibhai was alected as sarpanch. It is alleged that the said Nanajibhai Narsibhai belongs to rival group. Inspite of repeated representations and directions by the Deputy District Development Officer of the Junagadh District Panchayat, the Ajab Gram Panchayat-respondent No.1 is not making the payment to the petitioners on the ground of group rivalry. It is further stated that respondent No.2-District Panchayat issued notice to the sarpanch Nanajibhai Narsibhai, directing him to make the payment as per the directions, failing which the District Panchayat will be compelled to take action against the sarpanch of respondent No.1 under section 49 of the Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961. The said order is said to have been challenged by the said Sarpanch before this Court by way of filing Special Civil Application which has been registered as Special Civil Application No.831/90.

An affidavit has been filed by the respondent No.1-Panchayat, stating that the claim of the petitioner is false and the same has been disputed by them from the beginning. It is further stated that the petitioners have prepared false record by issuing false receipts and false vouchers, and that on a close scrutiny of the record, it appears that the persons to whom the alleged receipts were issued by the petitioners have not at all given any money for running the cattle camp. Various serious allegations of forgery and preparation of false record has been made in this respect.

3.(cid:9)Before proceeding further, it will be convenient to take the facts of Special Civil Application No.831/90. The said Special Civil Application has been filed by Mr Nanajibhai Narsibhai seeking direction to quash notice dated 9.1.90 - Annexure 'E', whereby a direction has been given to the Panchayat to release amount of Rs.1,71,500/in favour of private parties who cla.... Ajab Gram Panchayat - respondent No.1.

4.(cid:9)No reply to this petition has been filed by the District Development Officer.

5.(cid:9)From the narration of the facts of both these Special Civil Application, it clearly appears that there is serious dispute with respect to the payment of Rs.1,71,500/-, which cannot be decided in the writ jurisdiction. However, instead of relegating the petitioners of S.C.A. No.4682/90 to file a Civil Suit, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent-District Development Officer to hold a fresh enquiry after giving opportunity to the concerned parties and pass an appropriate order.

6.(cid:9)In view of the aforesaid, both the Special Civil Applications being No.4682/90 and 831/90 are allowed and the following order is passed:

(i) In Special Civil Application No.831/90, the order dated 9.1.1990 at Annexure 'E' is hereby quashed and set aside.

(ii) In Special Civil Application No.4682/90, it is directed that the District Development Officer, Junagadh to hold an enquiry with respect to the amount due to the petitioners. For this purpose, he will summon the entire relevant records and will give a fair opportunity to the petitioners, Mr Nanagibhai Narsibhai and the present office bearers of the Ajab Gram Panchayat - respondent No.1.

(iii) The parties shall appear before the District Development Officer on 6.3.1996. .......T.......T.......J.......T.......T........T.......T.......J.......T (cid:9)Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs. ...

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Applications are disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961 — s. 49.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 30 Jan 1996. The bench was N N MATHUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments