RAMKRISHNA MILLS CO LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI -------------------------------------------------------------- RAMKRISHNA MILLS CO LTD Versus UNION OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

Special Civil Application No. 4082 of 1984 MR SA MEHTA for NANAVATI & NANAVATI for Petitioner MR SR SHAH for Respondent No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 11/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI) #. By this Petition, challenge is made to the demand of Excise Duty on a by-product (half-burnt coal ash) described as cinder. According to the respondents, cinder is an excisable item falling within the Heading

26.21 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 under old tariff item no. 68. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that coal ash or cinder which is obtained by use of coal in boiler for generating electricity cannot be held to be a manufactured excisable item, either under the old tariff or the new tariff. It is not disputed that the present case pertains to the old tariff item no. 68. Reliance on behalf of the petitioner is placed on the decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited v. Union of India reported in 2001 (131) E.L.T. 535 (Guj.). Learned counsel for the Department has informed this Court that against this decision a Special Leave Petition has been filed in the Supreme Court and is pending decision. #. Learned counsel appearing for the Department made some attempt to point out that the decision of Ahmedabad Electricity Company (supra) pertains to the new tariff entry and therefore is not applicable to the present case. We, however, find from the Division Bench decision of this Court (supra) that in paragraph 11 even there is a mention of the old tariff item no. 68 and reference was made to the decision in the case of Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Collector 1996 (82) E.L.T. A160 (S.C.) of the Supreme Court which has held that even under the old tariff such waste or by-product called cinder is not liable to levy of excise duty under the said tariff item no. 68. Since the point raised is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court, we allow this Petition. The impugned orders dated 24-4-1984 and 15-6-1984 (Annexure C) passed by the respondent Assistant Collector of Central Excise Division III, Ahmedabad are hereby quashed. (cid:9)Rule is made absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (cid:9) (cid:9) (RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.) [sndevu] (cid:9) (cid:9)