✦ Gujarat High Court · 10 Aug 2026

Judgment · High Court · 2026

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Having heard learned advocate for the applicant and on perusal of the averments made in the application, the application deserves to be allowed which is hereby allowed in terms of paragraph No.7(A).

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1187 of 2026 In F/SECOND APPEAL/33040/2025 ================================================================ NIRANJAN MANILAL DARJI Versus LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED KAMLABEN @ BABUBEN MANILAL TAILOR & ORS. ================================================================ Appearance: PRATEEK S BHATIA(8629) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT Date : 10/08/2026 ORAL ORDER

#1. Leave to amend the prayer clause is granted. Necessary incorporation be made, forthwith.

#2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Prateek S. Bhatia for the applicant.

#3. Having heard learned advocate for the applicant and on perusal of the averments made in the application, the application deserves to be allowed which is hereby allowed in terms of paragraph No.7(A).

#4. Subject to above, Registry is directed to restore the Second Appeal on its original file. (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) Manoj Kumar Rai Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Mca No. 1187 of 2026). ← Search more judgments