✦ Gujarat High Court · 30 Apr 1990

HIMATNAGAR NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Civil Application No. 3820 of 1990S K KESHOTE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 13/10/97 ORAL JUDGMENT

1.(cid:9)Challenge has been made by petitioner to the order of the respondent dated 30th April 1990, passed under section 14-B of the Employees' Provident Fudns & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, annexure `D' to this Special Civil Application.

2.(cid:9)This order is appealable under section 7-I of the aforesaid Act. Under section 7-D of this Act, a Tribunal has already been constituted by the Central Government. For the reasons and grounds given out in the Special Civil Application No.2454 of 1989 decided by this Court on 9.10.97, this Special Civil Application is not maintainable.

3.(cid:9)In the result, this Special Civil Application is dismissed only on the ground of availability of alternative remedy of appeal to the petitioner under section 7-I of the aforesaid Act. In case the petitioner files an appeal against the impugned order within a period of one month from today, the Tribunal shall not dismiss the same only on the ground of limitation and shall decide the same on merits. Interim relief, if any, granted by this Court, stands extended for six weeks. However, it shall be open to the Tribunal to consider the question of continuation of interim relief for further period in accordance with law and while considering this question, the Tribunal may not be influenced by the fact that this Court has granted interim relief in favour of the petitioner. The Special Civil Application is dismissed subject to aforesaid directions. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 30 Apr 1990. The bench was S K KESHOTE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 3820 of 1990). ← Search more judgments