✦ Gujarat High Court · 26 Jun 2001

AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 3150 of 1996 · Gujarat High Court

AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 3150 of 1996Y B BHATT, M C PATEL3 min read

Case at a glance

Judgment

CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 26/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT)

1.(cid:9)On a joint request of the learned counsel for the respective parties, this appeal is taken up for final hearing today.

2.(cid:9)This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 at the instance of the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, being the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident.

3.(cid:9)The appellant herein challenges the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Bhavnagar wherein the Tribunal has allowed the claim petition of the present respondent no. 1, and awarded compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest etc., for the injuries sustained by him.

4.(cid:9)We have heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, carefully perused the impugned judgment and award and have also examined such documentary material on record to which our attention has been drawn.

4.1(cid:9)As a result of the hearing and discussion, we find that there is some scope for a slight reduction in the amount of compensation awarded to the claimant, in view of the evidentiary material on record and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant. Moreover, learned counsel for the respective parties state that the fair and just amount of compensation which ought to be awarded to the claimant is left to the discretion of the court, after hearing the learned counsel and after perusing the evidentiary material on record, as aforesaid. The learned counsel for the respective parties also state that reasons for awarding the just and reasonable amount of compensation in the aforesaid circumstances, need not be given by the court.

5.(cid:9)In the premises aforesaid, we have carefully applied our minds to the fact situation, and the evidentiary material on record, and consequently we find that the interests of justice would be met, if the amount of compensation of Rs.2,80,000/- (Rupees two lakhs eighty thousand only) is awarded to the claimants (under all the Heads), and that this figure of compensation would be fair, just and equitable to both the appellant as also the respondent - claimant.

6.(cid:9)We, therefore, hold and direct that the first respondent - claimant shall be entitled to total compensation under all the Heads in the amount of Rs.2,80,000/- instead of Rs.3,00,000/-, as determined by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment and award. We hold and find accordingly. This appeal is, therefore, partly allowed with no order as to costs.

6.1(cid:9)The impugned award shall stand modified only to the aforesaid extent and the rest of the award stands confirmed.

7.(cid:9)Decree accordingly.

8.(cid:9)It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that some part of the impugned award has already been deposited with the Tribunal. He further states that the balance amount of the award, as modified by the present judgment and decree, shall be deposited with the Tribunal together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, within four weeks from today. (cid:9) (cid:9)( Y.B. Bhatt, J. ) (cid:9) (cid:9)( M.C. Patel, J. ) (cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 26 Jun 2001. The bench was Y B BHATT, M C PATEL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 3150 of 1996). ← Search more judgments