LPA No. 1051 of 2012 · Gujarat High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
order, this appeal is dismissed being covered by the aforesaid
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Therefore, for the reasons given in the aforesaid judgment and LPA/1051/2012 JUDGMENT order, this appeal is dismissed being covered by the aforesaid decision, along with Civil Application. Parties shall bear their own costs. [ V. M. Sahai, J. ] [ G. B. Shah, J.…
Judgment
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH ===================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see NO the judgment? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not? NO 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the NO judgment? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge? NO NO ===================================== RAUT NITESH CHHAGANBHAI - Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s) ===================================== Appearance : MS PAURAMI B SHETH for Appellant(s) : 1, MR RAKESH R. PATEL, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, MR DG SHUKLA for Respondent(s) : 2, ===================================== LPA/1051/2012 JUDGMENT CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH Date : 01/11/2012 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)
We have heard Ms. Paurami B. Sheth, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. D. G. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. Rakesh R. Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for respondent No. 1.
Counsel for the parties agree that the controversy involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No. 925 of 2012 in Ashokkumar Jashubhai Solanki Vs. Gujarat Public Service Commission and Other, decided on 10/09/2012. The only difference being the change in the caste – category. Earlier decision was with regard to the SEBC category candidate and in the instant case, the candidate is of General category.
Operative part
Therefore, for the reasons given in the aforesaid judgment and LPA/1051/2012 JUDGMENT order, this appeal is dismissed being covered by the aforesaid decision, along with Civil Application. Parties shall bear their own costs. [ V. M. Sahai, J. ] [ G. B. Shah, J. ]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: order, this appeal is dismissed being covered by the aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 10 Sep 2012. The bench was V M SAHAI, G B SHAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.