Mr M H Chhatrapati v. No.1 ORAL ORDER
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
fresh application before the trial court under section 8 of the Act. No question of giving liberty arises. If such an application is filed, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law. Suffice it to say that I do not find any error of jurisdiction which calls for interference by this Court in exercise of powers under Section 115 of C.P.C. This Revision Application is accordingly rejected. It is made clear that I am not expressing any opinion with respect to the nature of the provisions of section 8 of the Act as to whether the same is mandatory or directory.
21.1.99(cid:9) (cid:9)[N N Mathur, J] msp. (cid:9) (cid:9)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 8; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 21 Jan 1999. The bench was N N MATHUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.