THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. Hemanta Kumar Das and 2 Ors
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 169(4)
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 21 r. 1
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont. Cas(C)/1/2025 Rakhe Tallar Son of Late Rakhe Teri, Village Bomte, PO Boasimla, Kamle District, Arunachal Pradesh 791120 VERSUS Hemanta Kumar Das and 2 Ors Son of Late Narendra Nath Das, resident of Hengrabari Mouza, Beltola, Ward No. 33, House No. 36, PO Dispur, Assa, 781005 Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late L P Ali Village Lilabari Balijan Kakoi Rajghar Balijan PO Lilabari Lakhimpur District Assam 787051 2:Md. Inush Ali 3:Pritam Rooy Age: 0 Occupation : General manger Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd 2nd Floor Sreeji Towers Near Ganeshguri Flyover Guwahati Kamrup District Assam 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : Subu Koyang, Karli Ete, Debo Mangkhya, Ugin Puri, Radhe Yakang, Kago Taja Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE Date : 16-01-2025 ORDER Heard Mr. K. Taja, learned counsel for the petitioner. This contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of an award dated
18.06.2024, passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Lower Subansiri/Kurung Kumey/Kamle/Kra Daadi Districts, Ziro in MACT Case (Z) No.03/2021. Having considered the Section 169 (4) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 and the provision of the Order 21 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), I am of the considered view that present contempt petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the present contempt petitioner is dismissed being not maintainable. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 169(4); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 21 r. 1.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 16 Jan 2025. The bench was KARDAK ETE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.