✦ Gauhati High Court

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. Smt. Lalremmawii & Anr.

Rfa No. 19 of 2026ROBIN PHUKAN

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/123/2026 Sh. Vanlalngheta S/o Rohmingliana (L) R/o H.No.C-66(A) Chanmari West Aizawl VERSUS Smt. Lalremmawii and Anr. D/o Rohmingliana (L) R/o Zarkawt Aizawl 2:Smt. Laldingliani D/o Rohmingliana (L) R/o Bawngkawn Brigade Gilead Special School Brigade Field Road Aizawl Advocate for the Petitioner : Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : RFA/19/2026 Sh. Vanlalngheta S/o Rohmingliana (L), R/o H.No.C-66(A), Chanmari West, Aizawl VERSUS Smt. Lalremmawii and Anr. Page No.# 2/3 D/o Rohmingliana (L), R/o Zarkawt, Aizawl 2:Smt. Laldingliani D/o Rohmingliana (L) R/o Bawngkawn Brigade Gilead Special School Brigade Field Road Aizaw Advocate for the Petitioner : Mrs. Dinari T. Azyu, Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER

23.06.2026 Heard Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the applicant. This application under Order 41 Rule 5 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicant for staying operation of the impugned Order dated 17.04.2026. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the connected appeal has already been admitted from hearing and the record has been called for and as such, there is a requirement for staying the operation impugned Order dated

17.04.2026. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant and also considering the facts and circumstances of the record, the impugned Order dated 17.04.2026 passed by the Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 15/2025 stands stayed till disposal of the appeal. In terms of the above, this I.A. stands closed. Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Rfa No. 19 of 2026). ← Search more judgments