✦ Gauhati High Court

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. SHRI LONGDISE SANGTAM AND 2 ORS

DEVASHIS BARUAH

Case at a glance

Bench
DEVASHIS BARUAH

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/ 153/2023 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE A-25-27 ASAF ALI ROAD NEW DELHI-11002 AND REGIONAL AND DIVISIONAL OFFICES IN SEVERAL PLACES INCLUDING A REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI ASSAM AND A DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT DIMAPUR IN THE STATE OF NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI LONGDISE SANGTAM AND 2 ORS R/O H. NO. 56 CHARE TRONGER VILLAGE TUENSANG NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : VIKRAMJEET DEVNATH Advocate for : appearing for SHRI LONGDISE SANGTAM AND 2 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER

08.12.2023 The instant application has been filed under Order 41 Rule 5 Page No.# 2/2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking stay of the award dated 31.05.2022 passed in MAC Case No. 12/2020 by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mokokchung, Nagaland. This Court, upon hearing the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as the respondent No. 1 and also taking into account that the accompanying appeal has been admitted, stay the impugned judgment and award dated

31.05.2022, passed in MAC Case No. 12/2020 by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mokokchung, Nagaland, subject to a deposit of 50% of the awarded amount on or before

19.01.2024 before the Registry of this Court. This Court further directs that upon deposit of the said amount before the Registry, the respondent No. 1 would be at liberty to file an application before the Registry for release of the said amount. The Registry shall, on such application so filed by the respondent No. 1 release the said amount in favour of respondent No. 1 after carrying out the necessary verifications. With the above, the instant application stands disposed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments