THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petitions, the writ petitions are hereby disposed of with a
Judgment
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO Date : 18-02-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. Moa Jamir, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the four writ petitions and also heard Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents in all the writ petitions. At the very outset, Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Senior Government Advocate submits that since no affidavit-in- opposition has been filed, nor being filed, the Court may pass necessary order as deemed fit. Aggrieved by the superannuation orders issued by the respondents before they attain the superannuation age or number of years provided in the O.M No. AR-3/GEN- 231/2011 dated 04.05.2017 issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department (Administrative Reforms Branch), the petitioners approached this Court by filing the four writ petitions viz WP(C)/247(K) of 2017, WP(C)/248(K) of 2017, WP(C)/267(K) of 2017 and WP(C)/273(K) of 2017. The matters were adjudicated upon after giving the parties to file their respective pleadings and, they were disposed of by a common judgement dated
Operative part
12.12.2018. Out of the five writ petitions, the four writ petitions filed by the respondents were allowed and the respondents were directed to modify the petitioners Page No.# 5/5 pensionary benefits as per rules and taking into account the right dates of their retirements. The respondents did not file any appeal against the common judgement and order dated 12.12.2018, but did not comply with the directions given therein either. Aggrieved by the none common compliance of the respondents to the directions given in the common judgement and order stated above, the petitioners are here once again by filing the present writ petitions. Since no appeals have been filed against the judgement and order mentioned above and no affidavits have been filed by the respondents against the writ petitions, the writ petitions are hereby disposed of with a direction that the respondents should comply with the directions given in the common judgement and order dated 12.12.2018 passed in the four writ petitions mentioned above within a period of three months from the date of a receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petitions are disposed off accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitions, the writ petitions are hereby disposed of with a
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 18 Feb 2022. The bench was SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.