THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM & Anr. v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C) 170/2020 1:E.E. PANGTEANG, MLA AND ANR REPRESENTING 48-MOKA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, MON, NAGALAND, S/O LATE ENGA R/O ANGPHANG VILLAGE, MON, NAGALAND 2: C.L. JOHN MLA REPRESENTING 45-TEHOK ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY MON NAGALAND S/O CHENO R/O CHENWETNYU VILLAGE MON NAGALAN VERSUS 1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENT AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2:THE HON'BLE SPEAKER NAGALAND LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT NAGALAND LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:CHOTISUH SAZO MLA Page No.# 2/3 REPRESENTING 18-CHOZOBA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY PHEK NAGALAND C/O SECRETARY NAGALAND LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY KOHIMA NAGALAND 5:IMOKNG L. IMCHEN REPRESENTING 28-KORIDANG ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY MOKOKCHUNG NAGALAND C/O SECRETARY NAGALAND LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY KOHIMA NAGALAND 6:UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT NEW DELHI Advocate for the Petitioner : S. S. DEY, SR. ADV Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 04-05-2022 (S.Serto, J) Mr. D.J. Kapil, learned counsel appearing for the petition- ers pray that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition as he has been instructed to do so. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. Baplu Chakma, learned counsel appearing for respon- dent Nos. 4 and 5 and Mr. Yangerwati, learned C.G.C. appearing for the Union of India has no objection. In view of the prayer, this writ petition is disposed off on withdrawal. JUDGE JUDGE Sd/- Sd/- Comparing Assistant
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.