(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL v. SHRI. TALIREMBA AND 2 ORS
Judgment
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : COP(C)/13/2021 ALL NAGALAND JUDICIAL MINISTERIAL STAFF REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SHRI NILOKHEKA CHISHI, BENCH CLERK - III, PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DIST - DIMAPUR, NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI. TALIREMBA AND 2 ORS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE, NAGALAND, KOHIMA THE SECRETARY 2:SHRI NAMJOK KONYAK DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:SHRI. J.ALAM IAS THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : Z. ZHIMOMI Advocate for the Respondent : KEKHRIENGULIE Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/66/2022 ALL NAGALAND JUDICIAL MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SHRI. DIETHOLIE CHADI VERSUS SHRI. R RAMAKRISHNAN AND 2 ORS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:SHRI. NAMJOK KONYAK THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:SHRI. J. ALAM THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : Z. ZHIMOMI Advocate for : appearing for SHRI. R RAMAKRISHNAN AND 2 ORS Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/76/2022 ALL NAGALAND JUDICIAL MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS NEW PRESIDENT SHRI. NILOKHEKA CHISHI BENCH CLERK GR-III GR BRANCH IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL AND DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE KOHIMA VERSUS SHRI. R. RAMAKRISHNAN AND 2 ORS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:SHRI. NAMJOK KONYAK THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE NAGALAND KOHIMA Page No.# 3/3 3:SHRI. J. ALAM IAS THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : Z. ZHIMOMI Advocate for : appearing for SHRI. R. RAMAKRISHNAN AND 2 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.S. JAMIR ORDER Date : 17.03.2023 Heard Ms. S.K. Achumi, learned counsel for the pe- titioner. On the request made by Mr. Kekhriengulie, learned counsel for all the respondents 4(four) weeks time is allowed to file counter affidavit. List accordingly Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.