✦ Gauhati High Court

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. SMTI BIDYABATI BHUYAN AND 3 ORS

Judgment

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2108/2022 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24 WHITES ROAD CHENNAI-600014 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT CHIBBER HOUSE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-5 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE GUWAHATI (INSURER OF THE VEHICLE NO. DL-4C-E-2998 (TATA SUMO) VERSUS SMTI BIDYABATI BHUYAN AND 3 ORS W/O LATE RABIN KR. BHUYAN@ LATE RABINDRA KR. BHUYAN R/O BARPARA BONGAIGAON TOWN WARD NO.5 P.O. AND P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783380 2:MISS TONMOYEE BHUYAN D/O LATE RABIN KR. BHUYAN@ LATE RABINDRA KR. BHUYAN R/O BARPARA BONGAIGAON TOWN WARD NO.5 P.O. AND P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783380 3:SRI MANI JAIN S/O UNKNOWN Page No.# 2/3 4:SRI SATISH KUMAR S/O UNKNOWN R/O 3826 PRAJAPATI TEMPLE PAHARGANJ DELHI-110005 (OWNER OF VEHICLE NO. DL-4C-E-2998 (TATA SUMO)) 5:SRI SANJEEV KUMAR S/O PRITAMCHAND R/O 153-F SOUTH-EAST NEW DELHI (DRIVER OF VEHICLE NO. DL-4C-E-2998 (TATA SUMO)) ------------ Advocate for : MR. A DUTTA Advocate for : MR. K R BORA appearing for SMTI BIDYABATI BHUYAN AND 3 ORS THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY BEFORE Order

30.07.2022 Heard Mr. A Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application for stay/suspension of the judgment and award dated

27.06.2019 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No. 132/2000. As the connected appeal is admitted by this court, the operation of the judgment and award dated 27.06.2019 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No. 132/2000 shall remain stayed subject to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount before the Registry of this court within a period of three months. The Registry of this court shall allow the claimant to withdraw the same after proper verification. IA stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments