THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Jan 2026
- Bench
- SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Outcome
Disposed of
The bail petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 89, 92, 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 85, 89, 92
Key paragraphs
- Para 1010. The bail petition is disposed of accordingly.
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3902/2025 SRI JUN GOGOI S/O- NUNALGOGOI,R/O- DHENUKHANA GAON,P.S,- GHILAMARA,DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A KHANIKAR, R L CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA Date : 08.01.2026 ORDER Heard Mr. A. Khanikar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting of regular bail to the accused/petitioner namely, Sri Jun Gogoi, in connection with Ghilamara Police Station Case No. 41/2025 under Section 85/89/92 of BNS, 2023.
The allegation as reflected in the FIR is that the petitioner had been physically and mentally harassing the informant who is his wife and he also tried to terminate the pregnancy of the child that she was carrying in her womb but Page No.# 2/2 somehow she managed to escape.
The case is registered under Section 85 and subsequently under Section 89/92 was added. However, from the allegation contained in the FIR, prima facie it appears that Section 89 and 92 of BNSS is not attracted.
The learned Addl. P.P. has apprised that charge-sheet in the case has already been submitted vide C.S No. 45/2025 dated 11.12.2025 under Section 85/89/92 of BNS.
The petitioner is a Govt. servant and the sections under which the charges has been submitted are sessions triable.
Having regard to the nature of the allegations, it may not be necessary to remand the petitioner in custody.
Accordingly, the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 04.12.2025, is hereby made absolute.
It is further provided that the petitioner shall not try to intimidate or influence the witnesses in any manner and shall regularly participate in the trial if one commences.
Operative part
The bail petition is disposed of accordingly.
Send back the case diary. Comparing Assistant JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The bail petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 89, 92, 483; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 85, 89, 92.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 08 Jan 2026. The bench was SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.