✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

BASISTHA P.S. CASE No. 838 of 2013C R SARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The bail application is disposed of

Judgment

Operative part

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and considering the evidence so far collected by the Investigating Officer as well as the nature of alleged offence, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant benefit of pre-a rrest bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. Return the C.D. The bail application is disposed of.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The bail application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 354.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BASISTHA P.S. CASE No. 838 of 2013). ← Search more judgments