TS No. 45 of 2009 · Gauhati High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of as indicated hereinabove
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Operative part
he party. That being the position, I do not find any illegality in the order dated 29.05.2 012, passed by the learned Munsiff, Bongaigaon requiring interference in exercis e of the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, i t is made clear that such re-cross-examination would be limited to the issuance and service of summons on the present petitioner in TS No.26/2004, who is defend ant in TS No. 46/2009. The parties are directed to appear before the learned cou rt below on 06.03.2003. The petition stands disposed of as indicated hereinabove . No costs.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of as indicated hereinabove
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.