✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard Mr. U. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr . B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. This is an application filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.PC praying for granting pre-arrest bail in connection with Panbazar P. S. Case No. 187/2013 under Sections 420/468/34 of the IPC. Case Diary is produced before this Court as was called for. I have gone through the same. Having perused the Case Diary, I am of the opinion that custodial interr ogation of the petitioner is necessary. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. Return the case diary. Case is disposed of.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments