✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

C R SARMA

Case at a glance

Bench
C R SARMA

Outcome

Disposed of

The bail application is disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. A. Chamua, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms . B. Saikia, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. Perused the C.D. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, namely, Sri Nabajyoti Borah, in connection with Jajori P.S. Case No. 39/2013, under Sections 304(B)/34 IPC, has prayed for pre-arrest bail. The matter relates to death of the sister-in-law of the petitioner in suspicious circumstance i.e. (cid:28)burning (cid:29) injury. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and considering entire facts and circumstance of the case, I do not find it to be a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. The earlier interim order granted on 02.08.2013 stands recalled. Return the C.D. The bail application is disposed of.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The bail application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 304(B).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments