THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above observation and direction, this pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 147, 148, 149, 302, 326, 448
Judgment
Operative part
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2468/2023 MANIK ALI @ MAINKA ALI S/O PIYAR GOAL @ PIYAR ALI R/O VILL- PANIKHETI (PANIKHAITI), P.O. MAHTOLI, P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP (R), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 23/08/2023 Heard Mr. A A R Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. The petitioner, namely, Sri Manik Ali @ Mainka Ali, has filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in Kachumara P.S. Case No. 23/2023 registered under Sections 120(B)/147/148/149/448/326/302 IPC. Page No.# 2/2 During the deliberation of the matter, Mr. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, on instructions submitted that police after investigation of said Kachumara P.S. Case No. 23/2023 has already submitted the charge-sheet on 31.07.2023 vide Charge-Sheet No. 29/2023. In view of the above, the petitioner shall approach the appropriate Court for his regular bail in said Kachumara P.S. Case No. 23/2023. With the above observation and direction, this pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observation and direction, this pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 147, 148, 149, 302, 326, 448.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.