THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM & Anr. v. JUNAS BHENGRA AND 3 ORS
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 Aug 2022
- Bench
- DEVASHIS BARUAH
Outcome
Dismissed
The instant petition stands dismissed on withdrawal
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/163/2022 BIMALA MIZAR AND ANR W/O- SRI ROSHAN KUMAR MIZAR, R/O- KHALIHAMARI, MOUZA- GOROIMARI, P.S. TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM 2: ROSHAN KUMAR MIZAR S/O- LATE SHEM KUMAR MIZAR R/O- KHALIHAMARI MOUZA- GOROIMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSA VERSUS JUNAS BHENGRA AND 3 ORS. S/O- LATE DOMONIQUE BHENGRA, R/O- VILL.- KHALIHAMARI, MOUZA- GORPIMARI, P.S. TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM 2:PHILIP BHENGRA S/O- LATE DOMONIQUE BHENGRA R/O- VILL.- KHALIHAMARI MOUZA- GORPIMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM 3:AUGUSTIN BHENGRA S/O- LATE DOMONIQUE BHENGRA R/O- VILL.- KHALIHAMARI MOUZA- GORPIMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM 4:SRIMAN TATUNG BHENGRA Page No.# 2/2 S/O- LATE ALFAS BHENGRA R/O- VILL.- KHALIHAMARI MOUZA- GORPIMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SUNDI Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH Date : 01-08-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. P Sundi, learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the instant application challenging the order dated
Operative part
05.05.2022 passed in Title Suit No.1/2011. He, however, submits that he may be permitted to take such ground in appeal in terms with Section 105 of the CPC. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court permits the learned counsel to withdraw the instant application with liberty to take such grounds, if the suit is decided against him in appeal. The instant petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The instant petition stands dismissed on withdrawal
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 105.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 01 Aug 2022. The bench was DEVASHIS BARUAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.