THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Outcome
Bail refused
Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed on withdrawal
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2150/2023 BHRIGU @ BHIRGU SING BORDOLOI S/O- SANTANU SING BORDOLOI PERMANENT R/O- GUMURIA, NEAR POST OFFICE, P.S. SONAPUR, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING- H/N-02, BYE LANE NO.08 CDA PATHAR, P.S. SATGAON, DIST.- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN- 781027 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 23/06/2023 Heard Mr. D Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K K Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. This application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Bhrigu @ Bhrigu Sing Bordoloi, seeking bail in connection with Satgaon P.S. Case No. 104/2023 registered under Section 21(a) of NDPS Act, wherein he was arrested on 05.06.2023 and since then he is in custody. On instruction of the petitioner, Mr. D Chutia, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this bail application to which the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, has no objection. Page No.# 2/2 Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed on withdrawal
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 21(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.