TAMULPUR POLICE STATION CASE No. 20 of 2008 · Gauhati High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 302, 447
- Arms Act, 1959
Judgment
relevant case diary. Heard Mr. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. K Munir, lear ned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Considering the nature of incriminating materials available in the case diary against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that in the facts and at tending circumstances of the present case, the petitioner cannot be given the be nefit of pre-arrest bail inasmuch as his custodial interrogation, in the light o f the materials available in the case diary, is necessary. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for pre-arrest b ail, made by the petitioner, is hereby rejected. With the above observations and directions, this petition shall stand disposed o f.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.