CASE No. 11 of 1996 · Gauhati High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- P G AGARWAL
Outcome
Disposed of
The arbitration petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
We have perused the letter dt. 26.9.02 (Annexure-A/4) sent to the petitioner by the NIDC wherein it was stated that NIDC was working as a consultant/agent of CE DTI (now DOEACC). In view of the above, we hold NIDC is not a necessary party. They were a agent o f CEDTI and liability, if any, arising out of arbitration will be that of DOEACC only. In view of the above, we hereby appoint Mr. C. Upendra Singh, Retd. District & S essions Judge as the sole arbitrator in the matter. The arbitration petition is disposed of.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The arbitration petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration Act, 1996.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.