SRI RUHUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

28.05.2021, that is, for 818 days and the accused petitioner No.2 since 12.01.2022, that is, for 589 days. Perusal of the case record shows that the learned trial Court framed charges under Sections 22(c)/29 of the NDPS Act against the accused petitioners vide order, dated 27.07.2022. Thereafter, out of the listed 5(five) prosecution witnesses 3(three) PWs are already examined in the case. This Court is of the opinion that although there is bar under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act in granting bail to accused in matters involving commercial quantity in Page No.# 3/3 view of the mandate under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, if the accused petitioners are released on bail the remaining part of the trial is unlikely to be hampered. Accordingly, it is provided that each of the accused petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) only with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Karimganj subject to the following conditions- i) That the accused petitioners shall continue to appear before the learned trial Court on all dates to be fixed from time to time till the case is disposed of; ii) That the accused petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to the remaining prosecution witnesses, who are acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court; iii) That the accused petitioners shall refrain from committing any offences similar to the one of which they are accused of commission; and iv) That out of the two sureties, one must be a government servant subject to verification of the relevant documents, if deemed necessary and after such verification, the learned Court below shall return the original documents retaining legible scanned copy thereof on record for future reference. This disposes of the bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant