THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Outcome
Disposed of
11) With the above observation and direction, this writ petitions stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
6:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER SRIJANGRAM P.O. AND P.S. SRIJANGRAM DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783384 7:SORHAB ALI LANGUAGE TEACHER NARARBHITA M.E. MADRASSA VILL. AND P.O. NARARBHITA P.S. MERERCHAR DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783384 ------------ Advocate for : MD H R AHMED Advocate for : SC ELEM. EDU appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 02-05-2023 ORDER Heard Mr. H. R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Kaushik, learned Standing Counsel, Department of School (Elementary) Education for the respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 and 6. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department for the respondent No.2, Ms. D. Das Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No.4 as well as Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. 2) The Headmaster-cum-Secretary of Nararbhita ME Madrassa under Srijangram Education Block of District-Bongaigaon pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Managing Committee of said Madrassa on 15.01.1987, appointed the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher of the said Madrassa since its venture stage, while it was in the erstwhile District of Goalpara. Accordingly, the petitioner joined his service on Page No.# 3/4
16.01.1987 and since then, he is serving as an Assistant Teacher in the said Madrassa teaching Assamese Language to its students. 3) While the cases of teaching staff of the Venture Educational Institutions were taken up for consideration for provincialisation under the provisions of the Assam Education (Provincialisation of Services of Teachers and Re-organization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017, as amended, the District Scrutiny Committee (Elementary), Bongaigaon recommended the name of the respondent No.7 for provincialisation disregarding the better claim of the petitioner on the basis of which, the name of the respondent No.7 along with 2 other teachers have been uploaded in the website of the Directorate of Elementary Education, Assam as eligible for provincialisation under the said 2017 Act. 4) Subsequently, on the recommendation of the State Level Scrutiny Committee, the service of the respondent No.7 was provincialised as a Language Teacher by order dated 05.02.2021 under the said 2017 Act.
5) Being aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition. 6) Section 3(1) (xi) of said 2017 Act, as amended provides as follows:- In case of Venture Upper Primary School there shall be minimum three teachers or tutors at least one teacher each for (a) Science and Mathematics (b) Social Studies and (c) Languages: Provided that for additional posts it shall be considered in accordance with the norms and standards stipulated in the Schedule under Sections 19 and 25 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (Central Act No.35 of 2009). 7) Section 14 of said 2017 Act relates to “Appellate Authority”, which reads as follows-
Appellate Authority:- The State Level Scrutiny Committee shall be the appellate authority against any recommendation of the District Scrutiny Committee and the State Government in the concerned administrative department shall be the Appellate Authority against any recommendation of the State Level Scrutiny Committee.
Page No.# 4/4 8) The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of the Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs.
Operative part
Chhabil Dass Agarwal reported in (2014) 1 SCC 603 held that “when a statutory forum is created by law for redressal of grievances, writ petition should not be entertained ignoring said statutory provision.” 9) As there is a statutory provision of appeal under the said 2017 Act, the petitioner is directed to prefer an appeal before the Secretary, Department of School (Elementary) Education, Assam as provided under Section 14 of said 2017 Act as amended, on or before 25.05.2023 for redressal of his grievances along with a certified copy of this order, a copy of this writ petition including the Annexures appended thereto obtaining necessary acknowledgement from the said authority in that regard 10) In the event of filing of such appeal by the petitioner before the Secretary, Department of School (Elementary) Education, Assam as directed above, within the time so specified, the said authority on verification of relevant records in original and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondent No. 7 shall dispose of the said appeal of the petitioner within ninety days from the date of its receipt by a reasoned order intimating him about the outcome of his said appeal. 11) With the above observation and direction, this writ petitions stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 11) With the above observation and direction, this writ petitions stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Services of Teachers and Re-organization of Educational Institutions Act, 2017; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 — ss. 19, 25.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.