Judgment · High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner s [5] uffered from viral hepatitis ’B’ for a long period from 18.02.2005 to 15.01.2005 and during this period he was under treatment in the Gohpur PHC, district Sonit pur, Assam. He submits that the respondents were not justified in not considerin g his medical documents while passing the impugned order imposing the extreme pe nalty of dismissal from service. He also submits that in the circumstances of th e case, the petitioner could not have been declared a deserter. In support of hi s submission, learned counsel for the petitioner refers to and relies upon the f ollowing decisions: 1. 2. 3.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 31 Aug 2012. The bench was UJJAL BHUYAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.