THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 379, 420
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./571/2022 MANISH SHAH S/O LATE UMESH SHAH R/O TARUN NAGAR, BYE LANE NO. 9, NEAR BHARALU RIVER, P.S. GITA NAGAR, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA Date : 14-03-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. T. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam. By this application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner, Page No.# 2/2 namely, Sri Manish Shah has prayed for bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 266/2022 registered under Section 120(B)/420/379 of the IPC (GR Case No. 1973/2022). The present application is found to be premature and accordingly, rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 379, 420.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 14 Mar 2022. The bench was PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.