✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

T VAIPHEI

Case at a glance

Bench
T VAIPHEI

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. VAIPHEI Heard Mr. S N Tamuli, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B S S inha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C for granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, Sri Sorujaan Saikia @ Sri Bishwajit Saikia, who has been implicated in connection with Jorhat Sadar P.S. Case No. 110/13 (Corres ponding G.R. Case No. 204/13) Under Section 143/147/148/149/302/324/326/447/448 IPC. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the co-acc used have been released on pre-arrest bail by this Court by the order dated 12.3 .13 and dated 15.3.13 in AB No. 739/13 and AB No. 574/13 respectively and as suc h the petitioner is also entitled to be released on bail on parity. Under these circumstances there is no reason why custodial interrogation of the petitioner should be insisted upon. Resultantly, in the event of arrest the peti tioner shall be enlarged on bail executing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 20,000/ with one l ocal surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments