✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.Munir, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B S Sinh a, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam , who has produced the case diary. I h ave perused the same. The accused petitioner, Sri Pradip Choudhury was present at the time of execution of the Sale Deed but there is no such material to show that he had an y involvement in the incident of kidnapping. In view of the above, in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection w ith Basistha P.S.Case No.726/2011 registered u/s 365/34 IPC, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one local surety of the li ke amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority in connection with th e aforesaid P.S.Case. Petitioner is directed to appear before the I.O.concerned within seven days from today for recording his statements. A B stands disposed of.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments