Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 304(B)
Judgment
Heard Mr P.Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr K.Munir, le arned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Also perused the case diar y and the materials on record. On careful perusal of the case diary and the materials on record, it app ears that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is sufficient incriminati ng materials against the petitioner warrant his custodial interrogation in conne ction with the case. Accordingly, the prayer for pre arrest bail stands rejected .
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments