✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

KATAKEY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The petitioner shall not in any way hamper the investigation or tamper with t he evidence. The bail application stands allowed.

Judgment

Operative part

Heard Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sinha, learned Publi c Prosecutor, Assam. The petitioner Moulana Anser Ali by the present petition is seeking the privileg e of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in connection with Bilasipara PS C ase No. 259/2011 registered under Section 448/376 IPC. I have perused the case diary produced by the learned Public Prosecutor. Upon consideration of the materials available in the case diary, the privilege o f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner. It is accordingly directed that the petitioner, in the event of his arrest, in c onnection with the aforesaid police station case, shall be released on bail of R s. 20,000/- with two local sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the ar resting authority on the following conditions: - 1. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investig ating police officer as and when required;

2.

The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat o r promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police o fficer.

3.

The petitioner shall not in any way hamper the investigation or tamper with t he evidence. The bail application stands allowed.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 376, 448.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments