Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 376, 448
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The petitioner shall not in any way hamper the investigation or tamper with t he evidence. The bail application stands allowed.
Judgment
Operative part
Heard Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sinha, learned Publi c Prosecutor, Assam. The petitioner Moulana Anser Ali by the present petition is seeking the privileg e of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in connection with Bilasipara PS C ase No. 259/2011 registered under Section 448/376 IPC. I have perused the case diary produced by the learned Public Prosecutor. Upon consideration of the materials available in the case diary, the privilege o f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner. It is accordingly directed that the petitioner, in the event of his arrest, in c onnection with the aforesaid police station case, shall be released on bail of R s. 20,000/- with two local sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the ar resting authority on the following conditions: - 1. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investig ating police officer as and when required;
The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat o r promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police o fficer.
The petitioner shall not in any way hamper the investigation or tamper with t he evidence. The bail application stands allowed.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: f pre arrest bail is granted to the petitioner
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 376, 448.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.