THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
His pre-arrest bail application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 61(2), 316(2), 316(5), 318(4)
- Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 ss. 21(1), 21(2), 21(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With the above direction, the instant application for bail is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/462/2026 MD JAHANGIR ALIAS JAHANGIR ANSARI S/O- NASIM ANSARI, R/O - KHADIMAN, P.S.- BADARPUR, DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI, PIN- 788806, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF ASSAM 2:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE BADARPUR POLICE STATION DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K TALUKDAR, K G CHOWDHURY,MR. J M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
O R D E R
31.03.2026 I have heard the learned counsel Mr. S.K. Talukdar representing the petitioner as Page No.# 2/2 well as Mr. D.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in respect of Badarpur P.S. Case No.48/2025 under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 316(2) and 316(5) of BNS, 2023, r/w Section 21(1), 21(2), 21(3) of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019.
Operative part
The present petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court on 11.03.2026. Pursuant to that order, the petitioner Md. Jahangir @ Jahangir Ansari has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated with police investigation. For the aforesaid reasons, the present petitioner does not deserve to be detained in custody. His pre-arrest bail application is allowed.
The interim bail granted on 11.03.2026 is made absolute.
With the above direction, the instant application for bail is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: His pre-arrest bail application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 61(2), 316(2), 316(5), 318(4); Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 — ss. 21(1), 21(2), 21(3).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.