✦ Gauhati High Court

GEETANAGAR P.S. CASE No. 97 of 2011 · Gauhati High Court

GEETANAGAR P.S. CASE No. 97 of 2011SAHA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

With the aforesaid order, the instant application is allowed and accordi

Judgment

Operative part

This Court on 10.06.2011, while issuing notice for production of case di ary also passed an interim bail order in favour of the petitioner. Today when th e matter is taken up Mr. A Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in no way involved with the alleged offence. More so, th e petitioner was not even at the residence when the victim-deceased committed su icide. Mr. BS Sinha, learned Addl. PP for the respondent State submits that the re is no such material in the CD against the present petitioner from which it ca n be said that the petitioner is involved in the alleged offence. Rather there i s some materials in the CD which show that the petitioner was not present at the relevant time in the house where the victim-deceased committed suicide. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the parties, and on considering the materials available in the CD, there is no other alternat ive before this Court except to make the earlier interim order absolute. Accordingly, the earlier order dated 10.06.2011 is made absolute with a direction that the petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of her arre st in connection with the aforesaid PS Case on furnishing a bond of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on further condition that she shall appear before the IO of the case as and when call for. With the aforesaid order, the instant application is allowed and accordi

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid order, the instant application is allowed and accordi

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 306.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. GEETANAGAR P.S. CASE No. 97 of 2011). ← Search more judgments